|
|
Post by Red Wings/Blackhawks on Jan 19, 2019 6:01:34 GMT
To  RW Patrick Kane SNP 91 | $10.500M UFA 2023 | (Age 29) C Jonathan Toews TWF 87 | $10.500M UFA 2023 | (Age 30) LW Dominik Kahun PLY 78 | $0.925M UFA 2020 | (Age 23) RW Marko Dano TWF 77 | $0.800M RFA 2019 | (Age 23) To  RW Cam Atkinson SNP 85 | $5.875M UFA 2025 | (Age 29) C Alexander Wennberg PLY 83 | $4.900M UFA 2023 | (Age 24) RW Nick Foligno TWF 82 | $5.500M UFA 2021 | (Age 30) RW Josh Anderson PWF 81 | $1.850M UFA 2020 | (Age 24) D Olli Juolevi TWD 70 | $0.865M RFA 2021 | (Age 20) C Liam Foudy TWF 62 | $0.925M RFA 2021 | (Age 18) 1st 2019 1st 2020 2nd 2020 approves |
|
|
|
Post by Montreal Canadiens on Jan 19, 2019 6:24:59 GMT
CBJ accepts again
|
|
|
|
Post by Carolina Hurricanes on Jan 19, 2019 9:15:07 GMT
Wow this is massive and i'll accept this deal here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2019 11:27:22 GMT
Its still a reject from me
Same issues as past trades to much quanity over quality and those picks dont make much of a difference bc their going to be late 1sts
Reject
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Jan 19, 2019 14:56:45 GMT
I'm not a big fan of this either, with the way upgrades work here, getting a player to 91 overall is very difficult. Kane's value should be even higher because of that.
I reject.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2019 15:28:48 GMT
Wow if Chicago gm actually accepted this then I have some beachfront property for sale!
Reject
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Jan 19, 2019 15:30:42 GMT
Rejected/Final.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Wings/Blackhawks on Jan 19, 2019 18:38:47 GMT
Lmao clearly don’t know why u guys are rejecting this lol but if u seen the other offers for Kane lol this is the best and by far Hawks win this deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Wings/Blackhawks on Jan 19, 2019 18:40:38 GMT
I'm not a big fan of this either, with the way upgrades work here, getting a player to 91 overall is very difficult. Kane's value should be even higher because of that. I reject. Dude look again I think your wrong lol but whatever lol cause I know I win this deal and y’all know it to |
|
|
|
Post by Red Wings/Blackhawks on Jan 19, 2019 18:57:14 GMT
Its still a reject from me Same issues as past trades to much quanity over quality and those picks dont make much of a difference bc their going to be late 1sts Reject Hey Pens this deal is all quality lol Hawks keep hawks competitive if not better cause with this deal I could play a better roster without filling my bottom six to top 6 with 70 ish overall players also the picks and prospects worked for me cause this team would be good for a long time lmao so stupid but GM your own team. |
|
|
|
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Jan 19, 2019 19:41:29 GMT
I'm not a big fan of this either, with the way upgrades work here, getting a player to 91 overall is very difficult. Kane's value should be even higher because of that. I reject. Dude look again I think your wrong lol but whatever lol cause I know I win this deal and y’all know it to Actually you don't, even with Kane & Tazer's stupid contracts and the fact they're 30-ish, Jackets is getting far better return when neither are likely to get downgrade for at least 3 seasons. Even Juolevi will only reach 84, at the top end, unless you actually play him and he performs. Foudy's a wash, and another "if/when you play him" senario... And that pick will likely be at the bottom half of the draft, projecting this trade going through. It just doesn't add up at all man. Sorry. |
|
