|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Feb 11, 2019 1:49:55 GMT
To Columbus:
C Austin Czarnik PLY 79 | $1.250M UFA 2020 | (Age 25)
To Calgary:
RW Oliver Bjorkstrand SNP 80 | $2.500M UFA 2021 | (Age 23)
Accepted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Canucks/Ducks on Feb 11, 2019 2:06:24 GMT
Reject , Bjorkstrand is still growing for one more year , and he's already better than Czarnik. CBJ needs more than Czarnik
|
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 2:34:58 GMT
via mobile
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Feb 11, 2019 2:34:58 GMT
I love Czarnik, everyone knows that, but this does fall short of value for Bjorkstrand right now.
Rejected.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Wings/Blackhawks on Feb 11, 2019 2:41:17 GMT
yeah have to agree not quite enough on this at the current moment here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kings/Sabres GM on Feb 11, 2019 4:12:55 GMT
accept. CBJ is trying to cut cap
|
|
|
|
Post by Canucks/Ducks on Feb 11, 2019 4:33:02 GMT
Rejected final
|
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 4:36:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Feb 11, 2019 4:36:46 GMT
accept. CBJ is trying to cut cap 1) This is rejected and final. 2) You're accepting based on less than a million in cap? 😂 That's not a cap dump. |
|
|
|
Post by Kings/Sabres GM on Feb 11, 2019 5:44:53 GMT
accept. CBJ is trying to cut cap 1) This is rejected and final. 2) You're accepting based on less than a million in cap? 😂 That's not a cap dump. Thanks for the list |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Feb 11, 2019 5:52:03 GMT
Not really a list, moreso stating facts everybody here rejected the trade for except for you.
|
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 6:12:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Feb 11, 2019 6:12:12 GMT
1) This is rejected and final. 2) You're accepting based on less than a million in cap? 😂 That's not a cap dump. Thanks for the list You're welcome... Be happy it wasn't a novel. |
|
|
|
Post by Kings/Sabres GM on Feb 11, 2019 13:22:08 GMT
Just don't think a trade should be a rejected on a GM with CBJ's status when it involved moving a 4th liner out. There's been an 80 available in UFA this entire season. It's not like Bjorkstrand has elite potential or anything. Anything more that CGY adds is the most minuscule, maybe a 5th.
Are we going to be rejecting trades based on one team missing out on the value of a 5th? I get rejecting these deals if top 6, top 4, or a starting goalie types were involved for nothing, but 3rd line potential, I just don't really care enough to reject it.
That's fine though, just don't need to be patronized over a video game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Feb 11, 2019 15:59:13 GMT
Are we really rejecting marginal trades for guys who are 3rd/4th liners?
Really?
|
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 18:54:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by Montreal Canadiens on Feb 11, 2019 18:54:35 GMT
Guys I didn’t update ages. Bjork is now 24 and didn’t get a boost last season.
|
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 22:24:28 GMT
via mobile
Post by Golden Knights/Islanders on Feb 11, 2019 22:24:28 GMT
Guys I didn’t update ages. Bjork is now 24 and didn’t get a boost last season. That does make it a different trade for sure. |
|
|
|
CGY/CLB
Feb 11, 2019 22:56:50 GMT
via mobile
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Feb 11, 2019 22:56:50 GMT
Honestly, I don't give enough shits about this trade haha. One of the admins should just give this a final call.
|
|
